篇名

臺日民事醫療訴訟—實務比較研究(上)   免費試閱

並列篇名

Medical Lawsuits in Taiwan and Japan: A Compare Study of Legal Practices I

作者
中文摘要

醫療訴訟的核心問題在於爭點整理與證據調查,必須有效運用醫學專門知識始能盡其功。但臺灣律師卻面臨無法取得醫學意見的困境,以致於不能有效地整理爭點,且完全仰賴法院囑託鑑定,形同於將訴訟成本轉嫁由法院負擔,實屬異常。而臺灣與日本地處東亞,文化相近,同時繼受西方法學,均須對本土風俗民情有所因應,故本文以日本東京地院、大阪地院為主要研究對象,分別從律師、醫師與法院的角度,介紹日本民事醫療訴訟實務現狀,並以臺灣法院為比較觀察對象,以供實務界參考。

英文摘要

The core of medical litigation is the issue coordination and the investigation of proofs. It works by means of the medical special knowledge. However, attorneys in Taiwan couldn’t have any medical opinions, so couldn’t coordinate issues efficiently. They have to consequently depend on identification, which was assigned by the court. The latter affords the cost of litigations as a result. Nevertheless, this kind of phenomenon is totally abnormal. Having familiar culture, Taiwan and Japan, two of countries in East Asian, receipted the west jurisprudence at the same time, and had adjusted to their customs. Therefore, comparing to the courts in Taiwan, this article, based on the research to the judgements in Tokyo district court and Oosaka district court, tends to introduce the practicing of medical litigation in Japan in the dimensions of attorneys, physicians and courts.

起訖頁

185-204

關鍵詞
出版單位
DOI

10.3966/241553062016100002016  複製DOI  DOI查詢

QRCode

下一篇
數位整合服務
產品服務
讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688   傳真:+886-2-23318496   地址:臺北市館前路28號7樓

Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄
TOP