The Surgery Still Had to Fill in the Surgery Letter of Consent, the Anesthesia Letter of Consent Once More
The accused B took an artificial abortion for the plaintiff A in his obstetrics and gynecology clinic C for the second time after the first one was failed, but it still failed and caused a perforation of uterus, three places of intestinal perforation and peritonitis, etc. The judge found that B didn’t explain the reason for the second abortion, its success rate, possible complications and dangers to A and her spouse. B didn’t get any agreement in writing form the A and her family members either. This case doesn’t belong to the emergency according the proviso of Paragraph 63 Section 1 Medical Law. Paragraph 63 Section 1 Medical Law was still valid. The surgery is permitted under the circumstance of the agreement in writing of the patient or his / her spouse, family members and parties.