篇名

【醫療民事法】親自診察義務──論醫療法上醫師親自診察義務之內涵及其實踐   免費試閱

並列篇名

The Duty of Examination in Person ─ On the Content and the Practice of the Duty of Examination in Person According to the Medical Care Act

作者
中文摘要

醫師法第11條所明定之醫師親自診察義務,雖屬於保護他人之法律,但違反該義務之醫師是否須負民事或刑事上之責任,仍須以證明該義務之違反與結果發生間有因果關係為前提,從而鮮少有醫師單純因違反親自診察義務而遭判刑或判賠。惟若醫師未親自到場對病人為身體檢查或確認儀器檢查之結果,而仰賴其他人轉述,可能產生醫師以外之人未能精確傳達病人狀況、傳達錯誤、儀器失真等風險,故判斷醫師是否違反親自診察義務,不應過於寬鬆,醫院也應聘用合理的人力、啟用代理人制度等方式,避免醫師未親自診察成為常態。

英文摘要

The duty of examination in person of physicians according to paragraph 11 of Medical Care Act is a norm which protects others. However, whether the physician should take civil or criminal responsibilities still depends on the requirement of the causation between the duty violation and the consequence which have to been proven. Therefore, there was seldom a physician who only violated the duty of examination in personal and was sentenced to penalties or compensations. Nevertheless, if a physician had a physical examination which depended on the statement from the other rather taking a physical examination in person to a patient, or checking the result of the instruments inspect, it might be a risk for a wrongful statement of examinations and a distorted analysis of the result of instruments inspect. It shouldn’t be a loose rate to judge whether a physician violated the duty of examination in person. Meanwhile, the hospital should hire more men and have agents to avoid the problems that violating the duty of examination in person was a habitus.

起訖頁

096-114

出版單位
DOI

10.3966/241553062018090023007  複製DOI  DOI查詢

QRCode

數位整合服務
產品服務
讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688   傳真:+886-2-23318496   地址:臺北市館前路28號7樓

Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄
TOP