篇名

【智財刑事法】味全混油案:再論攙偽假冒罪之文義與保護法益的解釋問題   免費試閱

並列篇名

2013 Taiwan Food Scandal: Rethinking the Definition of Adulterated or Counterfeited Food and the Interests Protected by Law Against Food Adulteration

作者
中文摘要

依據立法史的比較法考察,攙偽假冒是為了使消費者誤信實際食品成分之較低品質、價值或效用符合交易期待的各種混入、移除、取代或加工處理行為。智慧財產法院將攙偽假冒罪解為保護人體健康安全,並未考量如何使表面上相互矛盾的立法意旨在最大限度內相容,更造成法體系融貫性的斷裂。實則,攙假行為造成的一般性、典型、普遍危險,乃是破壞交易秩序而非危害健康,當代立法者更已表達應切斷「攙偽假冒罪」與「人體健康安全法益」之關聯。

英文摘要

Food adulteration is addition, abstraction, or substitution of any substance in food or other food processing methods that cause consumer’s misconception about its quality, value, or function, which actually deviates negatively from what is reasonably expected in a food transaction. Interpreting the crime against adulteration as such to be a means to protect health interests misunderstands the original purpose of regulating and punishing adulteration. It unnecessarily imposes on the concept of adulteration institutional burdens that other legal measures are supposed to bear. Rather, adulteration is a special type of unfair competition. Market orders should be the only interest that is protected by the crime against adulteration.

起訖頁

064-087

出版單位
DOI

10.3966/241553062018100024006  複製DOI  DOI查詢

QRCode

數位整合服務
產品服務
讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688   傳真:+886-2-23318496   地址:臺北市館前路28號7樓

Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄
TOP