民事醫療過失之判定──論醫療常規與醫療水準【醫法新論】 試閱
Determination of Medical Negligence in Civil Liability: Medical Custom and Medical Level
2017年，最高法院針對醫療過失之判定，認為應採「醫療水準」作為注意標準，「醫療常規」僅係諸多審酌因素之一。因「醫療水準」注意標準係不易預見之規範性概念。本文欲藉由實證研究來探知實務所稱之「醫療水準」標準的概念內涵與解釋範圍，希冀透過實證研究獲得之經驗事實，可具體該注意標準以提昇其損害預防之功能，並檢視「醫療水準」是否較「醫療常規」，係更能公平合理分配醫療風險、調和醫病雙方利益之注意標
In 2017, a landmark judgement of the Supreme Court in Taiwan reaffirmed that medical negligence should be determined according to the “medical level” rather than the “medical custom,” “medical custom” was only one of the factors to judge the presence of negligence. However, the standard of “medical level” is an unpredictable concept. What actually constitutes “medical level”? In this article, we would explore the content of “medical level” by empirical legal studies in order to know if it is more fair than “medical custom” and improve its prophylactic function of Civil Code.
153-167
