【醫療刑事法】交付審判案:交付審判程序之目的與證據調查範圍【學習式判解評析】 試閱
Medical Criminal Law: The Purpose of Setting for Trial and The Fact Investigation
交付審判制度於2002年修法通過,該制度係針對檢察官行使緩起訴、不起訴權限時,賦予法院審審查有無濫用權限之制度。然而本件在交付審判過程中,各法院對於得否具體審查不起訴處分之事實認定並為一定程度之調查證據,見解並不相同。本文擬就交付審判過程中得否為證據調查及與交付審判制度目的之關聯性、與控訴原則之關係作出評析。
In 2002, Congress amended “setting for trial” system in criminal proceeding law. This system grants the court to examine whether there is abuse of power after the prosecutor exercising the power to suspend prosecution not to prosecute. However, the past “setting for trial” procedures shown that Taiwanese courts had been having different opinions on whether they should actively conduct fact investigations. This article intends to discuess whether the court should conduct a factual investigation during the “setting for trial” process.
040-057