非法執行醫療業務案:集合犯的認定與混合的包括一罪【學習式判解評析】 試閱
A Case about Practicing Medical Treatments Illegally:The Identification of the Collective Offence and the General Inclusive Offence
本件被告與護理師共謀,先為病患進行注射後,再由被告記載不實病歷與處方箋。本文主要針對實務先將醫師法第28條與刑法第215條之業務登載不實當成集合犯後,再論兩罪成立想像競合的結論提出評釋。分別就本案所涉法條是否該當集合犯的定義、若不該當集合犯則是否可以夾結效果論以想像競合、若根本不該當想像競合,為何歷審判決並未對此結論提出異議等問題,結合日本學說實務提出分析與觀察。
Under a conspiracy, the accused in this case and a nurse injected a patient and then the accused made false record and prescription. This essay would be a commentary of the judgment, in which paragraph 28 Physicians Act and the offence of making a false entry according to paragraph 215 Criminal Law were treated as a collective offence firstly and then the similar ideal concurrence by the legal praxis. In accordance with Japanese legal theories and praxis, it would be the topics analyzed and observed in this essay whether the issued paragraphs deserve to be the definition of collective offence, whether the similar ideal concurrence could be operated by the effect of parenthesis if not deserve, why the judgments in trial levels didn’t have any objection against this kind of conclusion if these two offences wouldn’t be the similar ideal concurrence at all.
064-083