篇名

鴉片中毒案:行為、侵害與相當因果關係【學習式判解評析】   免費試閱

並列篇名

The Case of Poisoning of Opium: Deed, Infringement and Adequacy

作者
中文摘要

本件病患家屬主張醫師診斷錯誤及病歷記載不實,據以請求侵權行為損害賠償及出具道歉聲明,然其主張受侵害之權利,並非病患之健康、身體或生命權,而是家屬之名譽權、對病患遺體之身分法益,以及對於已故病患虔敬追思之人格權。本文以此事件為例,反思相當因果關係的概念,以及其與行為及權利侵害的關聯。

英文摘要

The plaintiffs (the late patient’s family) argued that the doctors had made a wrongful diagnosis and false statement in medical records, and, having their claim based on tort, pursued for damage and apology. However, the rights allegedly infringed according to the plaintiffs were not the right to the late patient’s health, bodily integrity or life, but that to family’s reputation, the legal interest in their relationship with the late patient’s body, and their personality-right to memorize the late patient. This case is in this article taken as an example to reconsider the concept of adequacy (Adäquanz) and its connection with deed and infringement of rights.

起訖頁

071-085

出版單位
DOI

10.53106/241553062022050067006  複製DOI  DOI查詢

QRCode

數位整合服務
產品服務
讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688   傳真:+886-2-23318496   地址:臺北市館前路28號7樓

Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄
TOP