篇名

【醫療刑事法】肝臟惡性腫瘤切除術後照護案:術後照護刑事過失審查   免費試閱

並列篇名

Case of Post Resection Care for Liver Malignant Tumor: Criminal Negligence Review of Postoperative Care

作者
中文摘要

醫療法第82條修正後於2018年1月24日公布施行,其中第3項及第4項有關醫事人員刑事責任之條文內涵如何於個案中實際操作,在學術界呈現出許多不同觀點的論述。司法實務上,最高法院107年度台上字第4587號刑事判決,對於醫療法第82條修正的精神及法律適用有非常詳盡的說明,本判決即是引用其內容作為判斷被告是否有罪之法理依據,並作出撤銷原審於醫療法第82條修正前的判決,改諭知被告無罪。由於最高法院的見解具有指標意義,將來各級法院有關醫療刑事案件的審查標準應會趨向一致。

英文摘要

The amendment to Article 82 of the Medical Care Act came into effect on January 24, 2018. Among them, the contents of the 3rd and 4th provisions concerning the criminal liability of medical personnel are actually applied in individual cases. Many different views have been presented in the academic world. In judicial practice, Criminal judgment No. 4587 of the Supreme Court in 2018 has a very detailed discussion on the spirit and application of the law amended by Article 82 of the Medical Care Act. And made a reversal of the original trial’s judgment before the amendment to Article 82 of the Medical Care Act, and changed the verdict to the defendant was not guilty. Due to Supreme Court’s decision being of significance and definitiveness, the review standards for medical criminal cases at all levels of courts will tend to be in accordance.

起訖頁

098-119

出版單位
DOI

10.3966/241553062020050043008  複製DOI  DOI查詢

QRCode

數位整合服務
產品服務
讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688   傳真:+886-2-23318496   地址:臺北市館前路28號7樓

Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄
TOP