違法酒駕與行政罰之關係及重新領照之限制——兼評高雄高等行政法院110年度訴字第462號判決【本期企劃】 試閱
The Relationship between Illegal Drunk Driving and Administrative Penalties and the Restrictions on Re-Licensing-Commentary on the 2010 Kaohsiung High Administrative Court Judgment No. 462
政府為解決違法酒駕，歷來修法即不斷提出各種手段，如在處罰條例中提高罰鍰等。此外，則更納入刑罰。惟此是否會過度限制人民之權利，應有檢討之必要。本文先從違法酒駕與行政罰間之關係出發，探討納入刑罰後，是否影響原有行政罰功能之發揮？其次，即以高雄高等行政法院110年度訴字第462號判決為例，探要求人民應完成一定酒駕防制教育及酒癮治療後，始得考照之規定，有無過度限制人民行動自由等之可能？期藉此在法治上能有所助益。
In order to solve the problem of illegal drunk driving, the government has always revised the law and continuously proposed various means, such as increasing fines in the penalty regulations. In addition, penalties are included. However, it is necessary to review whether this will excessively restrict people’s rights. This article first starts from the relationship between illegal drunk driving and administrative penalties, and explores whether the inclusion of penalties will affect the original function of administrative penalties? Secondly, taking the Kaohsiung High Administrative Court’s Judgment No. 462 of 2021 as an example, it explores whether the requirement that people must complete certain drunk driving prevention education and alcohol addiction treatment before they can obtain a license is an excessive restriction on people’s freedom of movement, etc. possible? I hope this can be helpful in the rule of law.
016-030
