篇名

對當事人之一方不利之舉證責任倒置不得阻礙當事人其他的舉證機會   免費試閱

並列篇名

A Reverse Onus Which Was Disadvantage to One of the Parties Shall Not Prohibit Any Other Opportunity to Present an Evidence

作者
中文摘要

原告主張,被告因錯誤醫療行為導致原告健康損害,應負擔因此所生之損害賠償責任。本案判決區別了診斷錯誤與診療瑕疵,前者係基於錯誤解讀檢驗內容所生,後者則係並未從事應進行的檢驗或診療工作。此外,舉證責任固然只有在診療有重大瑕疵時始有倒置之可能,但對當事人之一方不利之舉證責任倒置不得阻礙當事人其他的舉證機會。

英文摘要

The plaintiff complained that the accused should afford the responsibility of compensation for damage because of wrong medical treatment which lead to the health damage oft he plaintiff. The difference between diagnostic error and examination error was presented in this judgement. The former was happened because of a wrong interpretation to the result of the examination and the latter meant that a supposed examination was not be undertaken. In addition, there was though a possibility to shift burden of proof to the other party, only when the examination error was extremely serious, a reverse onus which was disadvantage to one of the parties shall not prohibit him any other opportunity to present an evidence.

起訖頁

125-130

出版單位
DOI

10.3966/241553062018100024010  複製DOI  DOI查詢

QRCode

數位整合服務
產品服務
讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688   傳真:+886-2-23318496   地址:臺北市館前路28號7樓

Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄
TOP